On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
South Carolina, United States
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and South Carolina, United States has an average temperature of 18°C/64°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than South Carolina, United States's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than South Carolina, United States . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and South Carolina, United States has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F.
On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States has less rain than
South Carolina, United States. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and South Carolina, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1365mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than South Carolina, United States's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 149mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 828 miles (1,332km) north east of South Carolina, United States.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than South Carolina, United States.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 445 miles (716km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 646 miles (1,040km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than South Carolina, United States.
No, New Hampshire is smaller than South Carolina.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 58,719 km2 (152,082 miles2) smaller than South Carolina.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times smaller than South Carolina.
Yes, New Hampshire is smaller than South Carolina.
New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2) and South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2)
which means that New Hampshire is 58,719 km2 (152,082 miles2) smaller than South Carolina.
That makes New Hampshire 3 times smaller than South Carolina.
The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is approximately 828 miles (1,332km) south west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further west by approximately 445 miles (716km).
No, South Carolina, United States is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, South Carolina, United States is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further south by approximately 646 miles (1,040km).
Yes, South Carolina is bigger than New Hampshire.
South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that South Carolina is 58,719 km2 (152,082 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes South Carolina 3 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, South Carolina is not smaller than New Hampshire.
South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2) and New Hampshire has an area of 24,214 km2 (62,714 miles2)
which means that South Carolina is 58,719 km2 (152,082 miles2) bigger than New Hampshire.
That makes South Carolina 3 times bigger than New Hampshire.
No, New Hampshire is not more populated than South Carolina.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that New Hampshire has 3,801,713 fewer people than South Carolina.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than South Carolina.
Yes, New Hampshire is less populated than South Carolina.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that New Hampshire has 3,801,713 fewer people than South Carolina.
That makes New Hampshire 4 times less populated than South Carolina.
Yes, South Carolina is more populated than New Hampshire.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South Carolina has 3,801,713 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes South Carolina 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.
No, South Carolina is not less populated than New Hampshire.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that South Carolina has 3,801,713 more people than New Hampshire.
That makes South Carolina 4 times more populated than New Hampshire.