On average across the year,
no, New Hampshire, United States is not hotter than
Aurora, Illinois
.
New Hampshire, United States has an average temperature of 9°C/48°F and Aurora, Illinois has an average temperature of 10°C/50°F.
New Hampshire, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is approximately the same temperature as Aurora, Illinois's hottest month (also July, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F).
On average across the year, yes, New Hampshire, United States is colder than Aurora, Illinois . New Hampshire, United States has an average minimum temperature of 3°C/37°F and Aurora, Illinois has an average minimum temperature of 5°C/41°F.
On average across the year,
yes, New Hampshire, United States has more rain than
Aurora, Illinois. New Hampshire, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1196mm and Aurora, Illinois has an average annual rainfall of 1160mm.
New Hampshire, United States's wettest month is October, with an average monthly rainfall of 130mm, which is drier than Aurora, Illinois's wettest month (May, with an average monthly rainfall of 171mm).
The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is approximately 857 miles (1,380km) east of Aurora, Illinois.
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further west than Aurora, Illinois.
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further east than Aurora, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further east by approximately 835 miles (1,344km).
Yes, New Hampshire, United States is further north than Aurora, Illinois. The midpoint of New Hampshire, United States is further north by approximately 99 miles (159km).
No, New Hampshire, United States is not further south than Aurora, Illinois.
The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is approximately 857 miles (1,380km) west of New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Illinois is further west than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is further west by approximately 835 miles (1,344km).
No, Aurora, Illinois is not further east than New Hampshire, United States.
No, Aurora, Illinois is not further north than New Hampshire, United States.
Yes, Aurora, Illinois is further south than New Hampshire, United States. The midpoint of Aurora, Illinois is further south by approximately 99 miles (159km).
Yes, New Hampshire is more populated than Aurora.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Aurora has a population of 200,661
which means that New Hampshire has 1,188,331 more people than Aurora.
That makes New Hampshire 7 times more populated than Aurora.
No, New Hampshire is not less populated than Aurora.
New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992 and Aurora has a population of 200,661
which means that New Hampshire has 1,188,331 more people than Aurora.
That makes New Hampshire 7 times more populated than Aurora.
No, Aurora is not more populated than New Hampshire.
Aurora has a population of 200,661 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Aurora has 1,188,331 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Aurora 7 times less populated than New Hampshire.
Yes, Aurora is less populated than New Hampshire.
Aurora has a population of 200,661 and New Hampshire has a population of 1,388,992
which means that Aurora has 1,188,331 fewer people than New Hampshire.
That makes Aurora 7 times less populated than New Hampshire.