On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka is hotter than
Bismarck, North Dakota
.
Sri Lanka has an average temperature of 26°C/79°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average temperature of 7°C/45°F.
Sri Lanka's hottest month is April, with an average maximum temperature of 31°C/88°F, which is hotter than Bismarck, North Dakota's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F).
On average across the year, no, Sri Lanka is not colder than Bismarck, North Dakota . Sri Lanka has an average minimum temperature of 22°C/72°F and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average minimum temperature of 0°C/32°F.
On average across the year,
yes, Sri Lanka has more rain than
Bismarck, North Dakota. Sri Lanka has an average annual rainfall of 1648mm and Bismarck, North Dakota has an average annual rainfall of 515mm.
Sri Lanka's wettest month is November, with an average monthly rainfall of 254mm, which is wetter than Bismarck, North Dakota's wettest month (June, with an average monthly rainfall of 83mm).
The midpoint of Sri Lanka is approximately 8,658 miles (13,933km) west of Bismarck, North Dakota.
No, Sri Lanka is not further west than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further east than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further east by approximately 12,302 miles (19,798km).
No, Sri Lanka is not further north than Bismarck, North Dakota.
Yes, Sri Lanka is further south than Bismarck, North Dakota. The midpoint of Sri Lanka is further south by approximately 2,690 miles (4,329km).
The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is approximately 8,658 miles (13,933km) east of Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further west than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further west by approximately 12,302 miles (19,798km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further east than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bismarck, North Dakota is further north than Sri Lanka. The midpoint of Bismarck, North Dakota is further north by approximately 2,690 miles (4,329km).
No, Bismarck, North Dakota is not further south than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Sri Lanka is more populated than Bismarck.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,116,349 more people than Bismarck.
That makes Sri Lanka 326 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Sri Lanka is not less populated than Bismarck.
Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516 and Bismarck has a population of 71,167
which means that Sri Lanka has 23,116,349 more people than Bismarck.
That makes Sri Lanka 326 times more populated than Bismarck.
No, Bismarck is not more populated than Sri Lanka.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Bismarck has 23,116,349 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Bismarck 326 times less populated than Sri Lanka.
Yes, Bismarck is less populated than Sri Lanka.
Bismarck has a population of 71,167 and Sri Lanka has a population of 23,187,516
which means that Bismarck has 23,116,349 fewer people than Sri Lanka.
That makes Bismarck 326 times less populated than Sri Lanka.