On average across the year,
no, South Dakota, United States is not hotter than
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.
South Dakota, United States has an average temperature of 8°C/46°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average temperature of 20°C/68°F.
South Dakota, United States's hottest month is July, with an average maximum temperature of 30°C/86°F, which is not hotter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's hottest month (August, with an average maximum temperature of 35°C/95°F).
On average across the year, yes, South Dakota, United States is colder than Rancho Cucamonga, California . South Dakota, United States has an average minimum temperature of 1°C/34°F and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average minimum temperature of 13°C/55°F.
On average across the year,
yes, South Dakota, United States has more rain than
Rancho Cucamonga, California. South Dakota, United States has an average annual rainfall of 498mm and Rancho Cucamonga, California has an average annual rainfall of 280mm.
South Dakota, United States's wettest month is May, with an average monthly rainfall of 74mm, which is wetter than Rancho Cucamonga, California's wettest month (December, with an average monthly rainfall of 70mm).
The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is approximately 1,164 miles (1,874km) north east of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
No, South Dakota, United States is not further west than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further east than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further east by approximately 804 miles (1,294km).
Yes, South Dakota, United States is further north than Rancho Cucamonga, California. The midpoint of South Dakota, United States is further north by approximately 682 miles (1,097km).
No, South Dakota, United States is not further south than Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is approximately 1,164 miles (1,874km) south west of South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further west by approximately 804 miles (1,294km).
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further east than South Dakota, United States.
No, Rancho Cucamonga, California is not further north than South Dakota, United States.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south than South Dakota, United States. The midpoint of Rancho Cucamonga, California is further south by approximately 682 miles (1,097km).
Yes, South Dakota is more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that South Dakota has 720,140 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, South Dakota is not less populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
South Dakota has a population of 895,376 and Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236
which means that South Dakota has 720,140 more people than Rancho Cucamonga.
That makes South Dakota 5 times more populated than Rancho Cucamonga.
No, Rancho Cucamonga is not more populated than South Dakota.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 720,140 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 5 times less populated than South Dakota.
Yes, Rancho Cucamonga is less populated than South Dakota.
Rancho Cucamonga has a population of 175,236 and South Dakota has a population of 895,376
which means that Rancho Cucamonga has 720,140 fewer people than South Dakota.
That makes Rancho Cucamonga 5 times less populated than South Dakota.