On average across the year,
yes, Rwanda is hotter than
South Carolina, United States
.
Rwanda has an average temperature of 22°C/72°F and South Carolina, United States has an average temperature of 18°C/64°F.
Rwanda's hottest month is February, with an average maximum temperature of 29°C/84°F, which is not hotter than South Carolina, United States's hottest month (July, with an average maximum temperature of 33°C/91°F).
On average across the year, no, Rwanda is not colder than South Carolina, United States . Rwanda has an average minimum temperature of 17°C/63°F and South Carolina, United States has an average minimum temperature of 12°C/54°F.
On average across the year,
no, Rwanda has less rain than
South Carolina, United States. Rwanda has an average annual rainfall of 726mm and South Carolina, United States has an average annual rainfall of 1365mm.
Rwanda's wettest month is April, with an average monthly rainfall of 141mm, which is drier than South Carolina, United States's wettest month (July, with an average monthly rainfall of 149mm).
The midpoint of Rwanda is approximately 7,495 miles (12,062km) east of South Carolina, United States.
No, Rwanda is not further west than South Carolina, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further east than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further east by approximately 7,225 miles (11,628km).
No, Rwanda is not further north than South Carolina, United States.
Yes, Rwanda is further south than South Carolina, United States. The midpoint of Rwanda is further south by approximately 2,472 miles (3,978km).
No, Rwanda is smaller than South Carolina.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 58,265 km2 (150,906 miles2) smaller than South Carolina.
That makes Rwanda 3 times smaller than South Carolina.
Yes, Rwanda is smaller than South Carolina.
Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2) and South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2)
which means that Rwanda is 58,265 km2 (150,906 miles2) smaller than South Carolina.
That makes Rwanda 3 times smaller than South Carolina.
The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is approximately 7,495 miles (12,062km) west of Rwanda.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further west than Rwanda. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further west by approximately 7,225 miles (11,628km).
No, South Carolina, United States is not further east than Rwanda.
Yes, South Carolina, United States is further north than Rwanda. The midpoint of South Carolina, United States is further north by approximately 2,472 miles (3,978km).
No, South Carolina, United States is not further south than Rwanda.
Yes, South Carolina is bigger than Rwanda.
South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that South Carolina is 58,265 km2 (150,906 miles2) bigger than Rwanda.
That makes South Carolina 3 times bigger than Rwanda.
No, South Carolina is not smaller than Rwanda.
South Carolina has an area of 82,933 km2 (214,796 miles2) and Rwanda has an area of 24,668 km2 (63,890 miles2)
which means that South Carolina is 58,265 km2 (150,906 miles2) bigger than Rwanda.
That makes South Carolina 3 times bigger than Rwanda.
Yes, Rwanda is more populated than South Carolina.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that Rwanda has 7,983,025 more people than South Carolina.
That makes Rwanda 3 times more populated than South Carolina.
No, Rwanda is not less populated than South Carolina.
Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730 and South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705
which means that Rwanda has 7,983,025 more people than South Carolina.
That makes Rwanda 3 times more populated than South Carolina.
No, South Carolina is not more populated than Rwanda.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that South Carolina has 7,983,025 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes South Carolina 3 times less populated than Rwanda.
Yes, South Carolina is less populated than Rwanda.
South Carolina has a population of 5,190,705 and Rwanda has a population of 13,173,730
which means that South Carolina has 7,983,025 fewer people than Rwanda.
That makes South Carolina 3 times less populated than Rwanda.